نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
ندارد
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Epistemic contextualism is a view in epistemology that the semantic
contents of knowledge-attributing sentences vary relative to the
contexts of knowledge attributers. Traditionally, epistemologists regard
the semantic content of knowledge sentences as invariable across
contexts. This traditional prevailing view is famous to “invariantism.”
According to Subjective sensitive invariantism (SSI), the truth
conditions of knowledge attributers are constant in different contexts,
but truth values of them vary relative to the contexts of knowledge
attributers. Recently, Stephen Shaffer, a proponent of epistemic
contextualism, has criticized SSI. In this article, after defending of SSI
in contrast of Shaffer’s arguments, I argue his arguments are unsound.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)