نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
ندارد
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
The disagreements between Mulla Sadra and Ibn-Sina concerning the
issue of the union of the intellect and the intelligible represent an
example of the difference between the conceptions of two prominent
islamic philosophers of an important philosophical problem.
Two completely contrasting theories have been ascribed to Ibn-Sina in
this regard. Some of his words indicate his rejection of the union of the
intellect and the intelligible. While some of his other words indicate his
confirmation of this theory. Conversely, Mulla Sadra is a great
supporter of this theory and has adduced various arguments to
demonstrate it. The theory of the union of the intellect and the
intelligible, which is either denied or accepted by Ibn-Sina, is not in
harmony with the one supported by Mulla Sadra, and the views of these
two philosophers concerning this theory are totally different from each
other. Their disagreements can be summarized in two points:
1. Reality of intellection 2. Reality of the union
Considering the above two points of difference, we can say that their
conceptions of the union of the intellect and the intelligible are so
different from each other that they represent the intellectual
confrontation between them deeper than what it really is.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)