نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
ندارد
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
The meaning and it's relation with the word is the first problem in the
theatrical linguistics. Wittgenstein believes in the, Picture theory of
meaning, the significant depends on two poles, true pole and false pole.
Therefore in his oponion, the statements that aren't empirical aren't
propositions. Because the Propositions explainers the reality but the
statements aren't empirical so doesn’t represent anything. He critiques
his opinions in the “Philosophical Investigations” about the meaning
and its relations with the facts. In this book he believes the meaning of
a word is in its Use, and how it uses in the sentence and we must ask
about its Use in the sentence. His mistake in the Tractatus was a kind of
incorrect judgment about, the meaning, but he tries to reform it in the
Philosophical investigations. This essay represents the verification that
is acceptable for positivists have three problems:
necessary necessary in every dimension". But unlike to Anselem they
do not prove the existence of God through this definition. they prove
God's attributes by this. Then the kant's Objections to this argument has
been discussed.
The article continues with a second version of this argument. This
version avoids kant's Objections and try to prove God on the basis of
necessity of His being. If we can show that the proposition of "God
exists" is necesserily true, then this proposition is true in all possible
worlds. In the end Mulla Sadra's view of the rule of "necessary being is
necessary in every dimension" has been discussed and shown that this
view is compatible with the second version of ontological argument
کلیدواژهها [English]
)